Agreed use-case brief
The task, users, current process, data sources, responsibilities and success measures.
Focused engagement · Typically 3–5 weeks
Test one task with representative data and the people who do the work. Compare quality, time, cost and risks with the current process, then decide whether to proceed, revise or stop.
What you receive
The proof focuses on one bounded use case such as knowledge assistance, document processing, workflow automation or predictive analysis. Production deployment and ongoing support are separately scoped after the proof.
The task, users, current process, data sources, responsibilities and success measures.
A representative workflow tested with realistic cases, including difficult and failure scenarios.
A recommendation to stop, improve the test or prepare for deployment, supported by test results, costs and remaining risks.
Decision gates
Agree the success measures before testing and record both useful results and limitations.
Is the decision worth improving?A named user action and observable operational effect.
Can the evidence support it?Representative data, known limits and appropriate access controls.
Can people remain accountable?Review, abstention, escalation and audit designed into the workflow.
Can it be operated responsibly?Monitoring, security, cost, ownership and change control beyond the proof.
Stage the decision
Agree the evidence needed at each gate, then assess both lifecycle costs and potential value. Scope, data access, timing and commercial terms are confirmed after discovery.
Talk to us
Tell us about the task you want to improve. We will assess whether an AI proof is useful and what it would take to run it.